LITERARY DRINKERS

 

My interest in all things alcoholic is well known, as is my passion for the written word.  

Notwithstanding the current crisis caused by the Coronavirus, I love nothing more than a cosy night at home on my own, curled up with a good book and a glass of wine.  

With plans for the 5^th Ilminster Literary Festival well and truly scuppered this year, we are actively working on a great line up of authors for whenever we can hold our next one.  

We always aim to have authors, both local and from further afield, that will stimulate our minds and entertain us. It was a delight this year to hear from the winner of our writing competition, Alison Templeton from Norton-sub-Hamdon, that she ‘started creative writing through the festival: during the 2016 festival I went to the creative writing workshop led by Rachel Godfrey, and have been writing ever since.’ Just what we hoped to achieve.   

It is universally accepted that many of us myself included, have become rather fond of the bottle since lockdown. This got me thinking about certain famous writers who have been known to be partial to a tipple, or two.  

There is plenty of evidence that some of our most prodigious and famous authors had, shall we say, a little drink problem. Hemingway, F. Scott Fitzgerald, Tennessee Williams, Dylan Thomas, Edgar Allan Poe, James Joyce, the list is endless. It has not escaped my attention that the key protagonists tend to be men! 

There is of course the argument that alcohol, in moderation, helps to oil the wheels when it comes to mental activity and unleashing that creative genius we all so admire. According to one study, alcohol can actually increase creative cognition and improves problem-solving skills too. Many writers say that alcohol helps to rid them of inhibitions, enabling them to write more freely, and to survive the solitary life of a writer.  

I have an enquiring mind and sometimes all it takes is one simple question to gather the most interesting information, so this summer I asked a number of the authors we had earmarked to appear at the Lit. Fest. what their favourite tipple is. Here is a taste of what is still to come. 

Poet Melanie Branton, had this to say –  

‘In my last collection, I included a paean to my favourite drink. As I am Somerset-bred, the
choice was a no-brainer.’
I'm optimally placed
when embroiled and encased
in the ambit of cider's pure amber embrace.

I'd rather drink cider than soda or juices,
its sedulous sedative soothes and seduces,
so don't be sadistic and suddenly say
I have to drink soda, not cider, today. 

Crossword setter for The Times, Tim Moorey, who was all geared up to provide tips on solving cryptic crosswords, tells me that he believes in everything in moderation and survives on a morning cup of Twinings Decaf Breakfast Tea, with a Cointreau in the evening; just the one mind, and not every night. 

In addition to sharing his knowledge of the history and techniques of opera Professional Opera singer Tim Mirfin, was keen to expand on his favourite tipple: 

‘After brief reflection I am going to plum for a big, fat, round red wine, a Barolo. This is not a
particularly well-reasoned choice but one based on happy memories. It conjures up long,
blissfully unrushed, multi-coursed meals in large groups basking in Italian sunshine and
wallowing in the feeling that this is how we should all be living. Drinking it in cold, dark,
rain-sodden British winters still can't dim the association. It also feels, to me at least, a treat
drink, the prospect of an indulgence of tragic rarity. Heavy Italian reds are the sort of thing
professional singers need to allow themselves only once they've checked in their diary
that the succeeding day is reasonably clear - especially if you have finally acquired enough
self-knowledge to be sure that it won't just be the one glass...’     

The Noir Collective, a group of three award-winning writers of psychological fiction, also shared their secret tipples with me.  

Katharine Johnson prefers an Aperol spritz, ‘Because it reminds me of happy times in Italy where two of my books are set.’
G D Harper, a man after my own heart, plumped for an Underberg, a quirky German herbal digestif which is sold in little 20ml. bottles. Devotees of the drink collect bottle tops which they send to the company, receiving exclusive merchandise in return. He is the proud owner of a leather Underberg bullet belt which holds 12 bottles. Ideal party wear!
Finally, Helen Matthews gets us thinking beyond some of the miserable weather we have been experiencing. ‘On a summer evening it has to be gin and tonic, preferably with Bombay Sapphire gin, unflavoured tonic and a slice of lime. The distillery, at Laverstoke Mill, Hampshire, close to where I live, is mentioned in the Domesday Book and was a paper mill from 1719 before it was converted into a distillery.’ 

And as for me, I am rather partial to a Negroni, made with equal measures of gin, red vermouth and Campari, garnished with orange peel.  

With such a diverse group of writers at our disposal, this winter, I am very much looking forward to snuggling up by the fire with a good book, and a glass of something that will warm the cockles of my heart. 

Happy reading.  

ILMINSTER LITERARY FESTIVAL WRITING COMPETITION

 

Despite our best intentions, things do not always go according to plan. Such has been the case this year for all us as the consequences of the Coronavirus pandemic have affected our day-to-day lives in ways that this time last year we could not have imagined. This has of course also meant that a lot of local planned activities have had to be postponed or cancelled, including this year’s Ilminster Literary Festival, which would have been our fifth.  

Our team of Trustees had been working hard all year to put together an amazing line up of writers for us all to meet and listen to and were of course disappointed when we were forced to cancel the event because of the Covid-19 restrictions imposed 

However, moving forward, there is always next year, and in the meantime, knowing that we have a number of enthusiastic supporters and budding writers in our midst we promoted a writing competition during August. 

As one of three judges, I am delighted that we were able to unanimously select Alison Templeton from Norton-sub-Hamdon as the clear winner of a £30 book token, for her impressive and very apt Post-Covid poem.  

Linda Piggott-Vijeh 

 

Post-Covid 

First we need to catch it,this 

Invisible, silent, undercover agent of death. 

Global Enemy Number One. 

War and spy thrillers are, retrospectively, easy reads. 

 

Then we Post-Covid. How on earth, on this earth, 

Do we post Covid? 

Double wrap, bubble wrap, 

Incarcerate in transit, tracked, traced and signed for. 

 

Where to post Covid. 

Back to Wuhan whence it came? 

To the wet market pangolin and bat market. 

Mark it Deadly Poisonous with skull and cross bones. 

 

Then we post Covid to the ocean depths, 

Or deep underground. 

Drown or bury, until global warming 

Sea levels or wild fires it up out and away again. 

 

Who to post Covid? 

The scientists in sterile quarantine, 

In their perfect isolation to fathom this 

Pandemic devastation. 

 

Or post Covid to full PPE medics, 

Post Protective Environment. 

Intensive care through intensive caring, 

Propelled by intensive compassion. 

Don’t post Covid to politicians! 

Globally racing for power to heal, 

Power for money, or status, 

In the pandemic for world domination. 

No, post-Covid to hearts that are tender, 

Where less is best and more is everyone, irrespective. 

Every living thing breathing clean air 

And coma-induced-ventilation breathing becomes a metaphor for a time when human kind had not 

yet learned to be fully kind to its own kind or to the natural world it is part of. 

Alison Templeton 

30 August 2020 

La Campagna Restaurant Review

 

It had been several months since I last ate out; an extraordinary occurrence for me as I usually eat out five or six times a week. So, on one of my few outings since lockdown in March, I was delighted to find that the pub at the top of the road to my village, on the A303, had in the meantime, been turned into an Italian restaurant, La Campagna.

Part of a chain of five in the South West, I was keen to see what was on offer as I had heard good reports of it.

This particular branch had only been open for two months, at a very tricky time for everyone involved in the hospitality industry. However, like many other businesses across the country they had been able to take advantage of the government ‘Eat Out to Help Out’ scheme.

Open all day, which is a Godsend for me as I tend to want to eat at odd hours, two of us went for lunch.

Billing itself as providing the combination of a traditional pub-like atmosphere and an Italian brasserie, the interior was modern and spacious, with several comfy sofas for those not wanting to dine. They are making a good effort at coping with Covid restrictions, and the service is friendly, welcoming and helpful, particularly from managerial staff. Newly recruited staff seem less willing to engage with customers and would benefit from further training as menu knowledge was lacking and opportunities for upselling were missed. Staff in the kitchen also need to be aware that they can be seen by customers when using their mobile phones at their work stations.

The description on the La Campagna website is littered with superlatives, depicting an environment that does not quite deliver in reality. I have always believed that it is better to under-promise and over-deliver, rather than the reverse.

Describing the core menu as ‘exemplary’ seems a bit over the top, and I am not sure that the pizzas can accurately be described as ‘inventive’, or that there is an ‘exquisite array’ of desserts on offer; there is a wide choice, but all are pretty standard offerings. 

There was an extensive range of cocktails, wines (mainly Italian), and other beverages available, but there seems to be some confusion in describing the wines as the ‘best wines of the Campagna regions of Italy’. Campagna is actually a small village in the Campania region. Overall, the wines on offer were pretty decent for this type of casual dining establishment, but I did notice that only one of the ‘fine white’ wines on the list is Italian; the rest are French.

Disappointingly, wines by the glass were not offered in 125ml. sizes, which is actually against Licensing regulations, and which I felt obliged to point out. Although I was then served with the size requested, on both occasions I was charged for the larger sized glass, although unfortunately I did not notice this until after leaving the restaurant..

A two-course lunch is available Mon. – Fri. from 12-3, at £13.95 (3 courses for £13.95). On offer was a choice of 5 starters, 9 main dishes and 4 puds.

Some items on the set lunch carried a supplement, which is a constant, and common, irritant for me.

On the plus side food was well presented and the cooking competent overall, but several of the dishes sampled lacked that extra something which makes a meal memorable.

The two set lunch dishes sampled were:

The Funghi all'aglio (v) - mushrooms cooked in garlic & butter sauce, served with toasted Tuscan bread was pleasant enough but the sauce was thin and the mushrooms lacked interest. On a second visit the sauce had much more flavour.

The Pizza Margharita (v) with ham and mushrooms, had good flavour but was a devil to cut. It would have been better to have cut it before serving.

From the à la carte menu the Calamari Fritti was decent enough, and thankfully not covered in thick batter, but the portion was quite small for £6.95. 

The Capesante alla Fiorentina, pan fried king scallops, garlic wilted spinach, lemon butter sauce and lemon wedge, served with the coral attached, were delicious, but just two and a half were served and the muscle had not been trimmed properly. I felt this was poor value for money at £10.95.

On a second visit, several other dishes were sampled.

The Bruschetta, with black olives, tomato and basil on toasted foccaccia proved to be a hearty portion, and was notable for its good flavours at £6.95

The Fritto Misto, a lightly fried combination of tiger prawns, calamari and scallop (just one!) with a salad garnish and lemon and garlic mayonnaise was fairly pedestrian for £8.95.

The most disappointing dish sampled was the Avocado Primavera, which at £7.50 was comprised of mixed salad leaves, avocado, tomato, cucumber, red onions and prawn cocktail. Sadly, the dish was badly let down by poor quality prawns and inferior cocktail sauce.

On carrying out a price comparison for similar dishes offered by other comparable chains (ASK, Zizzi, Prezzo) it seems that the pricing at La Campagna is just about right.

Despite my comments, this was not a poor experience; the cooking overall was sound, and I shall return, if for no other reason than that I want to encourage any restaurant or bar on my doorstep that can provide reasonable quality food at reasonable prices. The jury is still out.

LA CAMPAGNA

Buckland St Mary, Chard TA20 3JE

01460 234292

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/lacampagnabarandrestaurant/

Twitter: @La_Campagna_ 

South Somerset Votes for a Stronger Somerset

 

In the wake of last week’s decision at South Somerset’s virtual full council meeting at which 38 of the 51 councillors present voted in favour of the Stronger Somerset business case put forward by the four district councils, I have been reflecting on the debate that took place.

Although the proposal was presented to us as a joint proposal from all four district councils, it is clear that South Somerset was very much in the driving seat. Given the short timescale involved, we should all be grateful that at least one local authority took the initiative.

Whilst across the districts the figure of 84% of councillors voting to support the proposal may well be true, in South Somerset it was just under 75%, and we must not forget that 9 out of 60 councillors chose not to attend the meeting, admittedly several due to ill health. All political parties did not express approval for a Stronger Somerset. In South Somerset, all Conservative councillors voted against. Apparently, the proposal is also receiving the backing of residents, but no evidence of this, or community engagement, was provided.

In putting people, businesses, and the environment first, whilst investing in Somerset, and remaining close to our communities is something to be applauded, in this ‘high level business case’ there was a palpable lack of specifics. If the proposal is actually the result of ‘extensive research and expert advice’, where was the evidence to demonstrate this?

When the named vote was taken, I was concerned that during the course of the meeting, which lasted for almost 90 minutes, at least 5 councillors seemed to be absent for part of the debate. I have always felt that if a person is not present for the entire proceedings then they should abstain from voting.

Although present at the meeting myself, it is not always easy to take in the full measure of an event when actively involved in proceedings. Now that we are all using technology to replace face-to-face meetings, I welcomed the opportunity to take advantage of viewing the Youtube video in full afterwards.

As much as we may want to re-assure the electorate that politics does not come into play when discussing the future of local government in Somerset, and whilst I do agree that we all want the best possible outcomes for those we represent, political divisions were very much present at the meeting.

At least we all agreed on two things; that in both cases there was a lack of detail and substance in the two business cases presented to us in recent weeks, and that there is a need for change. What has come into play is deciding exactly what form any change should take. Where many of my fellow South Somerset colleagues had, at the beginning of this year, been adamant that pursuing the case for a unitary authority was not the way forward, it was heartening to hear one key member state at this meeting that ‘a unitary authority, whether one or two, is one of only two practical solutions’. Even if this paucity of choice has been forced upon us by central government.

If part of the reasoning is that a one unitary authority is far too large, then there was little mention of why a north/south split of the county was considered unviable when compared with the east/west proposal put before us. Perhaps it was because that to suggest the main route for business and social travel for South Somerset was along the A37 towards Bath is nonsense. I have been travelling that route three times a week for the last 2 years, and it is a nightmare.

Whilst promising the delivery of this ‘bold new plan’, and real change in the way that services are provided for residents and businesses across Somerset, what it seems we will end up with is two councils and three other bodies, all with associated administrative costs. If that is the case, surely we may as well retain the status quo.

Much has been made of the ‘democratic deficit’ should the choice be for one single unitary authority. As I argued at the time, is not about geography but how actively engaged one’s political representatives are. Figures bandied around concerning population numbers seem to have become confused. Although the population of Somerset is around 560,000, the electorate is just 430,000, which I assume is where the figure of 100 councillors each representing 4,300 people comes from. The argument that this is too many flies in the face of the large number of councillors who are not only elected at district level but also serve as county councillors. By and large they seem to manage OK whilst at present representing on average over 7,000 electors, so even if the higher figure were taken, representation would still be significantly better than at present.

What disappointed me most was the paucity of the debate that took place. When any proposal is put forward, we should all expect there to be robust challenge and enquiry to ensure the right outcome. Last Thursday evening just 14 out of the total of 51 councillors present chose to take an active part. Of these, we were treated to repeat performances from some, which is to be expected; we all like the sound of our own voices from time to time. I counted what can only be described as statements, from just 7 councillors, all in favour. Even so, I would have expected there to be some effort at seeking clarification of some points produced in the 100+ page document. It was left to seven of us opposed to the proposal to ask a total of 12 questions. With such a lack of engagement, I worry that we are not truly serving our democratic purpose.

WATCH YOUR LANGUAGE!

 

Anyone who knows me will confirm that I have a mouth like a sewer. In my defence, as a council flat kid, from a single parent family, I actually learnt to swear like a trooper as a scholarship child at public school. 

Like everyone else, the pandemic has meant having to come to terms with the challenges that the ‘new norm’ poses, and our increased use of technology to communicate, has meant that we all need to be more cautious about our behaviour. Every now and again I express my views in ways that I appreciate may cause offence to others, for which I absolutely apologise.  

At this week’s SSDC full council meeting we were debating one of the most important issues we are likely to be facing for many years to come, the future of local government in Somerset. This is something that, contrary to what others may wish to believe, I take very seriously indeed. However, being away from home and having interrupted a holiday to partake in the meeting, one of many this week, I was forced to attend whilst in the company of others. Observant members noticed that at times during the meeting I was seen to be speaking to a third party. Quite true, as I was being pestered with questions whilst trying to pay attention to the proceedings. Finally, exasperated by the continual interruption I responded to one question in frustration, saying ‘I don’t give a f**k’. As soon became apparent by the shocked faces of some of my fellow councillors, the sound had not been muted, and the comment was widely broadcast.  

This is of course unacceptable but, in my defence, I was most certainly not referring to the content of the meeting. Whilst one cannot take back something that has been said or done, and whilst I have no desire to cause offence, I would argue that over my many years as a councillor I have seen other elected members behave equally badly, showing open contempt towards the public they represent, frequently sitting in full view whilst doing crosswords and sudoku, dozing off, accessing their private text messages and emails, as well as eating and drinking.  

Anyone viewing the Youtube video of SSDC’s meeting will observe that I was fully engaged, more so I would suggest that some others who whilst being present in body failed to actively participate, challenge and question the important issues we were faced with. Yes, I have a foul mouth, but I pay my taxes on time, have never abused anyone, threatened physical violence or been accused of dodgy business deals. Those who are eager to throw stones need to take heed of the proverb relating to glass houses.  

ONE SOMERSET OR A STRONGER SOMERSET?

As part of the ongoing debate in relation to the Future of Local Government in Somerset, the release of the business case prepared on behalf of the four district councils this last week has, as might be expected, been the cause of much interest. 

With few other commitments over the bank holiday weekend, I settled down to review the 103-page document.  

Having now fully considered this latest ‘business case’, with South Somerset being the lead authority for the district argument, I have been left with a strong sense of foreboding.  

Whatever one’s views on whether Somerset should become a one or two unitary authority, all of us involved with local government pretty much agree on two things. Firstly, there are five keys areas within the county where we do not perform as well as others, and secondly, if we wish for the lives of those who choose to live here to improve, then things must change. All that is understood. However, what there is not, anywhere in this documentation, is an acknowledgment that the districts are as much responsible for where we find ourselves economically and socially as the County Council.  

At the SSDC full council meeting in Feb. the option of a unitary was dismissed out of hand, with a focus on ‘collaboration and cooperation’ being the preferred option. I argued then that there has been plenty of opportunity for our local authorities to work together, but each, continue working with their own ‘silo’ mentality. 

For me, what is so evident in this current piece of documentation is its total lack of professionalism. Notwithstanding the tight timescale to produce it, it has clearly not been proof-read. The language used is often cumbersome, and full of ‘buzz’ words. In addition to the considerable amount of repetition, taking up as much as one third of the entire document, the number of errors littered throughout its glossy pages (typographically, grammatically, in sentence structure, omissions and spelling mistakes) are truly shocking. One of the most shameful sentences refers to the Heart of the South West Local Economic Partnership; it is actually Heart of the South West Local Enterprise Partnership. This is a basic schoolboy error. 

Such a poorly produced document concerning something so important can leave us with little faith in those purporting to bring about the necessary changes to ‘level up’ our county.  

What I want to know is who hired P A Consulting Ltd., and how much of our tax-payers money were they paid to produce something that to put it kindly, is so amateurish. 

Communities are promised ‘greater power and control devolved to local people’. Not if the current planning reforms at SSDC are anything to go by, where it is now almost impossible to contact a planning officer direct, and those without internet access are left behind. Amongst local residents, there is a real fear about proposals to give more power to parish and town councils they will be expected to take on more responsibility, but with little expectation of any additional funding.    

Much is made of ensuring that services provided by local government remain ‘modern, responsive, efficient, close, accessible and accountable to people’. Ask any one of those I am contacted by on a weekly basis and they will refute this robustly.  

In the options given, ‘C’ is listed as ‘Stronger Somerset’, whilst Option ‘D’ states ‘county unitary’, rather than One Somerset, clearly implying a county takeover bid.  

Much is made of transforming the way we work, but few of us will forget the failures of South Somerset‘s transformation programme, or the complete disaster that incurred when West Somerset and Taunton Deane merged.  

Both Glastonbury Festival and Bridgwater Carnival are mentioned several times. Whilst yes, they are key attractions, these are just once a year events, not forming part of the day-to-day lives of the vast majority of us.  

Likewise, the success of Hinkley Point is cited. All very exciting for the economy, until further on in the document it is blamed for the rise in house prices in that area. 

When it comes to the funding of two unitary authorities, rather than one, the cost of setting up two is said to be ‘marginally’ more costly, but little consideration is given to the ongoing costs of running two authorities. 

Our ageing population also comes in for some stick. There are just too many of us down here, and we live too long. We are not economically active, push house prices up, and are a drain on health services, so we can expect ‘prevention interventions’ to be put in place to keep us healthy and out of hospital. Perhaps euthanasia will help? 

In Somerset we have a ‘very low comparative council tax base’ when compared with areas such as Surrey (hardly a fair comparison). One reason given for this is the six years of council tax freeze; for which read, an increase in council tax in the near future. 

Forget rural tranquillity. Despite our crowded roads, it is pointed out several times that our population density is too low when compared with other parts of the country. However, we can be rest assured that communities will be involved in designing and delivering services that are tailored to local needs. Try telling that to the those I represent.  

In assessing options against critical success factors (3.4) building on a ‘track record of commercial investment’ forms the approach to improving housing and economic prosperity. Whilst I cannot speak for the other districts, SSDCs track record in this respect is hardly something to be proud of. 

Under the Quality Assessment Summary (3.5) the scoring mechanism used is scaled from low= 3; medium = 5; high = 10. Why then are scores of 5 given a ‘high’ on the critical success factor scale? This lack of attention to detail is worrying.  

Overall, although this document, with its jazzy coloured charts, may look impressive on the surface, in making such an important decision in relation to the future shape of our county and its governance, we must all learn to read between the lines and challenge what we are being told.  

Not once is there anything about ‘how’ any of these reforms may be achieved.  

The proverb ‘fine words butter no parsnips’ readily springs to mind.