HE
topic of fines issued to parents and guardians for a child’s
non-attendance at school continues to rear its ugly head. I fully
expect, with the school holidays on the horizon, we shall see and
hear much more about it.
Personally,
although I think it is absolutely vital that we ensure our children
take full advantage of all the opportunities that a free education
can offer, I believe this “big stick” approach is wrong.
While
I agree that in the past some, but by no means all, parents have had
a rather lax attitude towards school attendance, there are
circumstances in which absence is not necessarily detrimental. As a
society we must look at education in a much rounder sense than just
that provided within a school environment with a fairly rigid
approach to the curriculum.
Learning
and achievement can take many forms and travel and exposure to new
experiences is one of the most rewarding. With some “blue sky”
thinking schools should be able find ways in which learning can
continue to take place no matter where the pupil is physically
situated.
There
are those parents who choose to home school or send their children to
private school, and the inspection regime that so closely dictates
the agenda of local authority educational provision is much more
flexible in approach.
There
is of course the argument that it is the responsibility of parents,
in putting their offspring first, to manage their lives accordingly,
but this is easier said than done.
For
many families, especially where perhaps one parent works away, or in
the case of several children being at different schools with
different term times, the dilemma of what to do with children during
school holidays and when to take any kind of affordable holiday, can
be a challenging one to resolve.
What
we must do is to have meaningful dialogue at a local level to look
for ways in which we can to find an appropriate solution. I’ve seen
very little about how and where the fines paid are to be spent by the
schools in question, boosting ever-depleting funds I suspect. Surely
not?
No comments:
Post a Comment