he headlines have
been full of warnings on the dangers of eating of sugar; all set to shift drugs
and alcohol off their perch as leaders in the addiction stakes.
Apparently the average
Briton consumes 238 teaspoons of sugar each week. Hardly surprising given that
the drink of choice for most is a can of fizzy drink.
I cannot deny feeling
smug that my preferred beverage is wine, preferably dry, and that according to
statistics I consume less than 3 spoonfuls of sugar a day when indulging in a
glass or two.
What I mind about
is that the food police seem to be out in force as sugar has become the
latest target in the firing line of their increasing attempts to control our
lives. This effort to avoid the obesity crisis hitting the NHS smacks too much
of shutting the stable door after the horse has bolted.
I suppose it had to come sooner or later, as we’ve long
since had the war on wine, red meat, salt, fat, butter; anything enjoyable
really. I’m certain there must be a whole army of do-gooders, lurking in the
background, ready to pounce, courtesy of tax payers’ money, finding new dangers
to highlight in order to keep themselves in cosy jobs, and using their usual
big stick approach.
Obesity is certainly an increasing problem, as my own
expanding waistline shows, but I suggest that sugar is being unfairly targeted
as the culprit of the crime.
As a substance sugar has been around for a long time, but
we’ve not always been fat.
First discovered by crusaders in the 11th
century, sugar indeed changed our eating habits, as we began to enjoy, and
yearn for, the feel good factor. In the past, before commercial manufacturers
got involved, sugar consumption was confined to the odd treat in the form of a
freshly baked cake for tea, a scone with homemade jam or a stick of rock at the
seaside; many’s the time I recall a visit to the local corner sweet shop,
pocket money in hand, to buy a bar of chocolate, a sherbet dip or a few jelly
babies. Those days are long since gone, as we have allowed ourselves to be
manipulated into thinking that more is better.
With the demise of independent retailers we have little
alternative but to buy the super-sized bars and multi-packs on offer, of everything
from doughnuts to Dairy Milk; often manufactured with cheap ingredients, with
only shareholder profits in mind.
It is, however, our own fault. Over a long period of time, and
with increasingly stressful lives, we have allowed ourselves to ruled by life
on the run (I’m just as guilty here), and are paying the price for it. We barely
have time to think about what we’re eating in our haste to move onto the next activity
or, in my case, meeting.
The nanny state approach towards changing our eating habits
has failed, largely because the real issue is our reliance on cheap factory
produced foods. I try not to eat ready meals, but resort to them on occasion,
and am horrified to find that meals such as shepherd’s pie, macaroni cheese or
chicken curry, have sugar in them. Sugar has no place in these foods. It is this
that needs to change, as at present we are being conned into consuming ‘hidden
sugars’.
I am also concerned about the call for increased use of artificial
sweeteners as a substitute for sugar. It is when we start messing around with our
food that we store up trouble for the future.
No comments:
Post a Comment