As a former free school meals kids, who grew up in a council
flat with my mum, who was a single parent, I have found it difficult in the
last few days to listen to the rhetoric of the naysayers in the wake of the
Education Secretary’s announcement over the re-introduction of grammar schools.
I
am one of the 3% from a ‘poor’ family who had the opportunity to go to grammar
school and will forever be thankful for that. Whilst I have never been a high
flyer, there was too much else going in my family for me to be able to achieve
my full potential, what I gained, and what I feel is of the utmost importance,
is an understanding of the importance and value of education, and what it can
help one to do in later life.
Much
has been said about social mobility and the ‘haves’ and have nots’. There is no
doubt that those families who are better off have an unfair advantage when it
comes to access to good education; the ability to move to an area with better
schools, or to have their children coached to ensure success in the required
exams, whether it be the 11+ or common entrance exam for a public school.
What
is missing here though, is the importance of attitude towards education. I am
still the only person in my entire family to have obtained ‘A’ levels and some
form of further education, largely gained during adulthood, as at the time
going on to university was not an option.
I
have what borders on an obsession with learning, always taking up the offer of
free classes in subjects I am interested in; I just cannot get enough.
Children
all have different abilities. Some will be academically gifted, whilst others
will have practical skills that may not stand up so well to formal examination.
Both types of learning, as long a learning is taking place, have an equal value
in modern day society. I believe that this balance between the practical and
academic cannot always best be served in a comprehensive school. There is often
the argument that gifted and talented children do not achieve their full
potential in such an environment. This is in part borne out by the number of
families I know who are in the lower social economic demographic, but who
invest a disproportionate amount of their small incomes on ensuring that their
children go to the best school they can afford. ‘Free school meals’ is also red
herring; there are many, many families who are eligible but not claim because
of the continued stigma.
It
is patronising to refer to lower income families as if they are somehow a
different species deliberately being excluded from the upper echelons of
society. In my experience this is not necessarily the case.
What
is paramount, is that we, as a society, instill in everyone, no matter what
their social status, a sense of a hopeful successful future, without barriers.
One in which everyone can achieve whatever it is that they want, and that when
the time comes the support, and appropriate education, will be there for the
asking.
One
size does not fit all. The focus must always be on what is best for the
individual child, which may well be access to a grammar school environment, or
not. What must not happen though, is that this the opportunity to attend one is
seen as any form of elitism.
No comments:
Post a Comment