At that point social media had not yet taken hold in quite the way in which it
has since.
There are of course benefits to using social media in as much as it gives the
man on the street a voice, and rightly so. There is also the counter argument
that those who choose to use social media to get their message across often
choose to do so in an inappropriate and counter-productive way.
The term trolling, ‘creating discord on the Internet by starting quarrels or
upsetting people by posting inflammatory messages in an online community;
someone who purposely says something controversial in order to get a rise out
of other users’, first came into use in the early 1990s, and we hear often of
those who have been victims of it.
What we are dealing with here is basically little more than tittle-tattle,
rumour or hearsay, driven by those who have their own agenda. What is not made
at all clear in their communications, these throw away lines and off-the-cuff
remarks born out of ignorance, is where they have obtained their information
from, how accurate it might be, and what their purpose is in exposing it to the
public domain.
Such gossips are fuelled by casual, unconstrained conversation or reports about
other people, typically involving details that are not confirmed as being true
By indulging in such conversations we are buying into the views of others who
have their own agendas, and feel justified in making comment with no hard facts
to back up their assertions. Sadly, we have seen much of this locally in recent
weeks and months, particularly in a political context, which is to be expected
as the battle lines are drawn. As members of the public, we owe it to ourselves
to treat such comments with the disdain they deserve, challenge their veracity
and, for an accurate account of events, go straight to the source. It is funny
how the people that know the least about us always have the most to say.
Shoring up their own insecurity and feelings of worthlessness at the expense of
others perhaps?
No comments:
Post a Comment