In the latest round of policies designed
to beat us all about the head, and make us change our behaviour,
whether we like it or not, I see that plastic carrier bags are once
again the target.
Clearly the efforts of supermarkets to charge us
all through the nose to buy 'bags for life', and then tout them
around town, effectively providing them with free advertising, have
not been as effective as intended.
I do not use supermarkets if I can avoid them, but then I don't
have a large hungry family to feed, or to wash or clean for. Unless
I've got friends staying, I doubt that I shop more than once a week,
and then usually just for a pint of milk to satisfy my craving for
that early morning cuppa.
However, the sad demise of our local shops continues.
Supermarkets are now more determined than ever to encroach on that
last bastion of private ownership, with their town centre 'mini
markets' and 'express' stores. It would seem that we may now well be
paying 5p a time for the privilege of having a bag in which to carry
away their goods.
What the 5p is for I've yet to determine. Is it to pay towards the
cost of handling the discarded bags as they litter the countryside, or in an effort to dissuade us
from using them altogether? Either way, the climate change brigade,
as well meaning as they may be, have got it all wrong, again.
The nonsense being espoused about the supposed cuts in carbon
emissions could quite easily be solved; by doing more to ensure that
as responsible citizens we do not litter. I am constantly appalled by
the flagrant way that my fellow citizens litter our streets with gay
abandon. That's where we should be putting our energy and money, not
paying to clear up after them.
We've all done it. On entering the supermarket for our daily paper
and the odd loaf of bread or packet of sugar, which they artfully
place towards the rear of the store, we are forced to pass all of their
tempting discounted offers and BOGOF offers along the way.
Eventually we arrive at the checkout, where we are then required to
check ourselves out (I refuse), thereby saving the supermarket money,
only to find that as a result of responding to those impulse buys we
couldn't resist, we need .... another bag or two to pack them in. So
not only have we spent more money than we had intended, but are to be
penalised even further.
Not once, in all the years that we have been battling away to
reduce landfill, have I seen anything other than token evidence of
supermarkets being required to engage in a meaningful way to reduce
the amount of unwanted packaging that is produced. They are the
driving force here in terms of how their products are presented to
us. It is no longer possible, in many cases, to buy just one apple,
one baking potato or one banana. We are being coerced into buying
more than we need, and it seems to me to be grossly unfair that once
again, whilst we line their pockets, we are required to pay the
consequences and stump up for their advertising as well.
Fortunately I shan't have to suffer; I've been saving and
collecting my used plastic bags for years, and should have enough to
see me through my lifetime. A small, but sweet, revenge.
Sunday, 9 February 2014
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment